<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>a (fashion) shooter &#187; canon 5d highlight tone priority</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.afashionshooter.com/tag/canon-5d-highlight-tone-priority/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.afashionshooter.com</link>
	<description>a photography blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:16:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Canon 5D Mark II, Take II</title>
		<link>http://www.afashionshooter.com/2009/01/07/canon-5d-mark-ii-take-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.afashionshooter.com/2009/01/07/canon-5d-mark-ii-take-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AFS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon 5d highlight tone priority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon 5D Mark II focusing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afashionshooter.com/?p=160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After some frustration and disappointment with the first one, I got a different 5D2 body a couple days ago, and strangely, the image quality is much improved over the first one &#8211; I think it may now rival my 1Ds3 image quality in some respects &#8211; including sharpness. Though the 1Ds3 images without a doubt [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: Arial;">After some frustration and disappointment with the first one, I got a different 5D2 body a couple days ago, and  strangely, the image quality is much improved over the first one &#8211; I think it <em><strong>may </strong></em>now rival my 1Ds3 image quality in some respects &#8211; including sharpness. Though the 1Ds3 images without a doubt still have more life and punch to them. They are just better, even with the same exact lenses. I will know more once I have done another proper shoot with models (next week.) S</span><span style="font-family: Arial;">econdly, this newer body does not introduce  banding when the Highlight Tone Priority is activated, which is good because I  think HTP can really make some images have a beautiful, creamy quality in the  highlights. Thirdly, the auto-focus seems to be better on this new one. Today I  conduced a test in a similar situation to the model shoot posted below. I had a  model standing in the same location with overcast daylight coming in the  window at a similar light level, and the camera did much better at finding focus  using the outer focus point. The First 5D2 got around 50% in focus images, and  the test I did today got around 65% in focus. [This total was edited Jan 10, 2009] (I used the 85 1.8 lens, as it  performed the best in terms of AF on the original 5D2 body.) Importantly, the  camera was not as likely to illuminate the in-focus indicator when the camera  had not achieved focused. This is still not nearly as good was what I get with  the 1Ds3 in the same conditions using outer it&#8217;s AF points, but it&#8217;s not bad,  and probably better than the 5D Mark I.</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">In any case, so far so good with the newer body, I am much  relieved. Still, I wonder how many other people are going around with sub-par  $3000 Mark IIs now&#8230;</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">For the record, they each have the same firmware version  (1.0.6) and the serial numbers are:</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">(the bad one &#8211; bought sometime in Nov.)</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: Arial;">Camera Body No. 0220105xxx</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">(the better one &#8211; bought Jan 5)</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: Arial;">Camera Body No. 0320212xxx</span></div>
<div>Looks like Firmware 1.0.7 was just released tonight. We&#8217;ll see if that offers further improvement&#8230;</div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">P.S. B+H finally had the S precision focusing screens  today, and I got one for the 5D2, and it really makes a big difference. Leaves  you with no doubt as to exactly what is and what is not in focus.</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;">P.P.S. Going forward I intend to get back to talking more  about photography and lighting and less about busted cameras&#8230;</span></div>
<div>Addendum 1/9/09</div>
<div>I recently read about the 5D2&#8242;s new sensor self-cleaning unit that includes a fluorine coating on the low-pass filter for better dust resistance. Perhaps this is responsible for taking some of the life out of the images as compared to the 1Ds3&#8230;</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.afashionshooter.com/2009/01/07/canon-5d-mark-ii-take-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

