a (fashion) shooter

    cameras

    • Canon 5D Mark II: new day for still photographers?
    • Canon 1Ds Mark III notes
    • Canon 5D notes
    • the Canon 50mm 1.2 L lens
    • Canon 5D Mark II notes
    • black dots, black dots everyewhere...
    • Twisty lens on the 5D2
    • 5D2 AF in dim light: :-(
    • Canon 5D Mark II, Take II
    • Sveta Utkina

    food

    • food, dude (off on a tangent)
    • food and drink with the Canon Rebel T21

    lighting & technique

    • one light wonders - using a single light source in the studio
    • 5D2 test shoot
    • Sveta Utkina
    • Waterways (lucky landscapes)
    • one light wonders: a magazine + video shoot with just one light
    • finally, the workshops!
    • Workshops: the Creative Director
    • girl with head
    • homeofthevain.com's Nikola Tamindzic
    • food, dude (off on a tangent)

    lighting workshops

    • lighting workshops!
    • First lighting workshop (not really)
    • Allie Crandell of MTV’s "The City"
    • finally, the workshops!
    • Workshops: the Creative Director
    • girl with head

    the industry

    • what's in the galleries:
    • web vs. print
    • Annie Leibovitz /Miley Cyrus
    • good guys
    • The Rep: help or hindrance?
    • Magnum photographer at the New York Times
    • some hot spreads
    • food, dude (off on a tangent)
    © 2011 - 2012
    Theme by WPShower

    black dots, black dots everyewhere…

    So, the internet seems to have exploded with “black dot syndrome” complaints about the Canon 5D Mark II.

    A few can be seen here,  here, and here.


    As it happens I came across a 1Ds3 image from Paris last year – and wouldn’t you know, there are some artifacts similar to this “BDS.” And if you zoom in close enough, and tweak the levels enough, they will become more clear. This image is at a mere 100% view so you can not see them that clearly :-)

    1Ds3 light, ACR conversion

    1Ds3 lights, ACR conversion

    Fact is, these 1Ds3 cameras have taken millions of images which have been published untold thousands of times, used for international advertising campaings, etc. And as far as I know, no one has complained about “black dots, lines, etc.” Why? I think it’s because pixel peeping at these levels (200%, 400%,) is not useful and has no purpose out here in the real world. After all, when looking even at a 100 percent view, you are effectively looking at what would be a 6.5 foot print (as rendered on your 72ppi screen) from 12 inches away and then complaining about the image quality. Have you ever looked at a print that large from that close? How’d it look?

    Anyway, while Canon may try to fix this “problem,” I do not think any new technical flaw has been uncovered here. I think we are just witnessing a slew of new eyeballs using Photoshop to view images which are zoomed way in, exposures jacked up, over-sharpened, etc. to reveal digital characteristics which for the most part are not really relevant in the real world.

    I encourage everyone to zoom their images back out to a proper viewing size, and get back to work. Your time is probably better spend working on improving your lighting skills :-O

    1ds3_lights
    1ds3_lights