<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>a fashion shooter &#187; Canon black dot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.afashionshooter.com/tag/canon-black-dot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.afashionshooter.com</link>
	<description>a photography blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:35:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>black dots, black dots everyewhere&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.afashionshooter.com/2008/12/09/black-dots-black-dots-everyewhere/</link>
		<comments>http://www.afashionshooter.com/2008/12/09/black-dots-black-dots-everyewhere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AFS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon 1ds mark iii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon 5d mark ii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon black dot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afashionshooter.com/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, the internet seems to have exploded with &#8220;black dot syndrome&#8221; complaints about the Canon 5D Mark II.
 A few can be seen here,  here, and here.

As it happens I came across a 1Ds3 image from Paris last year &#8211; and wouldn&#8217;t you know, there are some artifacts similar to this &#8220;BDS.&#8221; And if you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, the internet seems to have exploded with &#8220;black dot syndrome&#8221; complaints about the Canon 5D Mark II.</p>
<div><span style="font-family: Arial;"> A few can be seen <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/20119192@N00/3092243069/">here</a>,  <a href="http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/forum/topic/714654">here</a>, and <a href="http://photo.net/canon-eos-digital-camera-forum/00RewZ">here</a>.</span></div>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><br />
As it happens I came across a 1Ds3 image from Paris last year &#8211; and wouldn&#8217;t you know, there are some artifacts similar to this &#8220;BDS.&#8221; And if you zoom in close enough, and tweak the levels enough, they will become more clear. This image is at a mere 100% view so you can not see them that clearly <img src='http://www.afashionshooter.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
</span></span></p>
<div>
<div id="attachment_54" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.afashionshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/1ds3_lights.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-54" title="1ds3_lights" src="http://www.afashionshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/1ds3_lights-300x267.jpg" alt="1Ds3 light, ACR conversion" width="300" height="267" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">1Ds3 lights, ACR conversion</p></div>
</div>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">Fact is, these 1Ds3 cameras have taken millions of images which have been published untold thousands of times, used for international advertising campaings, etc. And as far as I know, no one has complained about &#8220;black dots, lines, etc.&#8221; Why? I think it&#8217;s because pixel peeping at these levels (200%, 400%,) is not useful and has no purpose out here in the real world. After all, when looking even at a 100 percent view, you are effectively looking at what would be a 6.5 foot print (as rendered on your 72ppi screen) from 12 inches away and then complaining about the image quality. Have you ever looked at a print that large from that close? How&#8217;d it look?</span></p>
<p>Anyway, while Canon may try to fix this &#8220;problem,&#8221; I do not think any new technical flaw has been uncovered here. I think we are just witnessing a slew of new eyeballs using Photoshop to view images which are zoomed way in, exposures jacked up, over-sharpened, etc. to reveal digital characteristics which for the most part are not really relevant in the real world.</p>
<p>I encourage everyone to zoom their images back out to a proper viewing size, and get back to work. Your time is probably better spend working on improving your lighting skills :-O</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.afashionshooter.com/2008/12/09/black-dots-black-dots-everyewhere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
